Trashion Show Cycle 1
A Grade 9 spring-semester exercise, made at least two years ago.
An early poster from my visual-arts coursework.
A Grade 9 spring-semester exercise, made at least two years ago.
An early poster from my visual-arts coursework.
A collaborative short film.
I participated in the filming and performance, and helped with the script and setting.
An earlier long-form response to a recorded performance of Thornton Wilder's Our Town.
English written by me · Chinese translated with AI assistance · also shared on social media
Our Town is a play written by Thornton Wilder. This play portrays the daily life, marriage, and death of the residents of Grover's Corners, a small town in New Hampshire. I watched a recorded stage performance of Our Town on BiliBili.
In fact, this play does not heavily rely on dramatic plot or elaborate sets. Instead, it adopts narration by an old man, direct address, and a seemingly monotonous tone. However, the dark set attracted my attention. These choices are consistent with the theory of Epic Theatre, proposed by Bertolt Brecht, which we have learned. The theory argues that drama should encourage active thinking through performances, rather than blind emotional engagement. Although Our Town is not technically a work of “Epic Theatre,” many of its techniques strongly reflect Brecht's principles.
The core of Epic Theatre is the “alienation effect,” which employs various techniques to break the boundary between reality and illusion constructed by the stage or characters. This approach prompts the audience to think critically about social issues. In Our Town, this concept is manifested through the Stage Manager. Notably, the Stage Manager does not appear to be performing on stage but rather seems to be playing a role backstage; however, in Our Town, the Stage Manager serves as a unique narrative device. From the beginning of the act, the Stage Manager breaks the fourth wall, speaking directly to the audience about specific names, playwrights, dates, and times, and even introducing the layout of Grover's Corners. He does not pretend the audience is nonexistent but acknowledges them, then describes the characters' backgrounds, futures, and so on. For example, he states that Miss Gibbs married a salesman and ultimately died of pneumonia. Through his presentation, he constantly reminds the audience of the dramatic framework when they are indulging in the plot, encouraging them to reflect on what the characters intend to show or reveal.
The play exposes stage machinery to create the “Alienation Effect” (the core of Epic Theatre). As shown on stage, most props are invisible, such as herbicide, tableware, newspapers, and meals. A small number of props are physically present, like rocking chairs and tables. While watching the performance, I noticed that the characters mimic ordinary daily activities, such as eating breakfast or doing homework on stage. However, the bare stage prevents the audience from losing themselves in visual details and directs their attention to the meaning of behaviors, such as the repetitiveness and passage of time in everyday life.
The technique I mentioned regarding the alienation effect alerts the audience: this is a dramatic performance, and they should focus on what the author aims to reflect. In the plot, the town encourages people to develop at a uniform pace, rather than through overwhelming emotions. For instance, when George becomes obsessed with baseball and neglects others, Emily argues that he is self-important. This plot complication reveals how personal flaws are criticized by the system (the town). Ironically, later when he succeeds, his past self-importance is forgotten.
Life in Grover's Corners is cyclical and monotonous. Act I: Daily Life, Act II: Love and Marriage, and Act III: Death and Eternity occur spontaneously among town members, even across generations, without change. As the Stage Manager alerts us, they identify themselves as “American, United States of America,” yet most town members have never left the town and scarcely consider other lifestyles. Exemplified by George, when he gives up the opportunity to attend agricultural college, it seems a personal choice but actually reinforces the town's culture rather than challenging it.
Tradition also plays a stabilizing role in the community. One impressive example in the play is that George believes separating the bride and groom is a superstition, yet Mr. Webb defends it as having “a lot of common sense.” This demonstrates how the town maintains order and eliminates uncertainty.
In conclusion, Our Town is not strictly an Epic Theatre work simply because the essence of Epic Theatre is political critique. In Our Town, there is no political critique or class oppression, so it is not a political work of Epic Theatre. However, it clearly adopts Brecht's principles, even the core one, using the alienation effect to address the audience, prevent emotional indulgence, and encourage critical thinking and reflection. Therefore, we can consider Our Town as a non-Brechtian play that combines Epic Theatre techniques to reflect daily life, tradition, and human awareness.
In Our Town, the moment that affected me most, and the one I liked best, was in Act II, when Emily suddenly hesitates before her wedding and wants to turn back.
It shows the enormous pressure exerted by the town's traditions. Emily keeps telling her father about her fear just as the wedding is about to begin. It is one of the few moments of emotional tension in the play. She realizes that marriage means leaving her parents, saying goodbye to childhood, and permanently leaving the familiar life she has known. She says there are many places she wants to see and things she wants to experience, and suddenly understands that she is being fixed onto an irreversible track. That fear and uncertainty make her want to say no.
What makes this sudden awareness powerful is how out of place it feels, as if an established route has been interrupted. A woman has the right to refuse a relationship, but backing out when everyone has arrived also affects the families and all the people involved. That tension makes Emily's hesitation both inconvenient and sharply real.
I was even more struck by the reaction around her. Nobody chooses to argue with her. Her father and the people of the town comfort her gently, repeating that everything will be all right. Her resistance is treated as a passing emotion rather than a choice that could change the future.
No one seriously considers the possibility that she will not marry, because in the town's value system life is supposed to follow its three acts: daily life, marriage, death, and eternity. A middle-aged woman at the wedding wipes away tears and tells the camera that it is “lovely,” even though she does not know why. Everyone agrees that it is beautiful.
This scene made me understand that the town's stability is not maintained through force. It is maintained through gentle persuasion and collective, silent agreement. Even when doubt appears, it is absorbed back into the cycle. The wedding is not a decision that can truly change a life; it is a step that must be completed. This depiction of repeated life also reminded me of Waiting for Godot. Both plays show people trapped in a cycle, although one is an absurd comedy whose language loses its logic. That connection gave me a deeper understanding of tradition's power in Our Town.
《我们的小镇》是桑顿·怀尔德所著的戏剧。这部戏剧描绘了新罕布什尔州一个小镇格罗弗角居民们的日常生活、婚姻和死亡。我在 BiliBili 上观看了一场《我们的小镇》的舞台表演录像。
实际上,这部戏剧并不高度依赖戏剧性的情节或华丽的布景。相反,它采用了一位老人的叙述、直接对话,并显得单调。然而,暗色调的布景吸引了我的注意。这些选择与我们所学的“史诗剧场”理论理念一致,该理论由贝托尔特·布莱希特提出。理论认为,戏剧表演应鼓励人们积极思考,而非盲目情感投入。尽管《我们的小镇》在技术上并非严格的“史诗剧场”作品,但许多手法强烈体现了布莱希特的原则。
史诗剧场的核心是“间离效果”,即运用不同技巧打破舞台或角色所构建的现实与幻象之间的界限。这种用法让观众对社会问题进行批判性思考。在《我们的小镇》中,这一理念通过舞台经理的角色体现。舞台经理从剧幕开始就打破第四堵墙,直接向观众谈论具体的名称、剧作家、日期和时间,甚至介绍格罗弗角的布局。他不假装观众不存在,而是承认观众的存在,然后描述角色的背景、未来等。例如,他指出吉布斯小姐嫁给了一名销售员,最终因肺炎去世。通过他的呈现,他不断在观众沉浸于剧情时提醒他们戏剧的框架,鼓励他们思考角色想要展示或揭示的内容。
这部戏剧通过暴露舞台机制来创造“间离效果”。大多数道具是不可见的,如除草剂、餐具、报纸和餐食;少量道具是实体展示的,如摇椅和桌子。角色模仿普通人的日常活动,如在舞台上吃早餐或做作业。但舞台是空的,这防止观众迷失在视觉细节中,转而关注行为的意义,如日常生活的重复性和时间性。
间离效果提醒观众:这是一场戏剧表演,应关注作者想要反映的内容。在剧情中,小镇鼓励人们以一致的步伐发展,而非过度情感化。例如,当乔治沉迷于棒球而忽视他人时,艾米丽批评他自大。这一情节揭示了个人缺陷如何被系统(小镇)所批评。讽刺的是,后来当他成功时,过去的自大被遗忘。
格罗弗角的生活是循环而单调的。第一幕是日常生活,第二幕是爱情与婚姻,第三幕是死亡与永恒。这些在小镇成员中自发发生,甚至跨越世代而无变化。正如舞台经理提醒我们的,他们自认为是“美国人,美利坚合众国”,但小镇中大多数成员从未离开过小镇,几乎不考虑其他生活方式。以乔治为例,当他放弃农业学院的机会时,这看似个人选择,却强化了小镇文化而非挑战它。
传统也在社区中扮演稳定角色。剧中一个令人印象深刻的例子是,乔治认为新娘和新郎分开是一种迷信,韦伯先生却辩护说这“很有常识”。这展示了小镇如何维持秩序并消除不确定性。
总之,《我们的小镇》并非严格的史诗剧场,因为史诗剧场的本质是政治批判。在《我们的小镇》中,不存在政治批判或阶级压迫,因此它不是一部政治性的史诗剧场作品。但它明确采用了布莱希特的原则,甚至是其核心,通过间离效果与观众对话,防止情感沉迷,鼓励批判性思考和反思。因此,我们可以将《我们的小镇》视为一部非布莱希特式戏剧,它结合了史诗剧场技巧来反映我们的日常生活、传统和人类意识。
在《我们的小镇》中,让我感受到最深,也是最喜欢的片段,是第二幕中 Emily 在婚礼前突然产生的一种没来由的犹豫,想要反悔的那个片段。
它展示了小镇传统所施加的巨大压力。在这一场景中,艾米丽在婚礼马上开始时向父亲倾诉自己的恐惧,这也是剧中为数不多的情绪张力展现。她意识到婚姻意味着离开父母、告别童年,以及永远离开自己熟悉的生活方式。她说这一生有很多地方想去看、想去经历,而此刻突然意识到自己将被固定在一条无法回头的人生轨道上。恐惧与不确定性让她想要说不。
这种突然的意识就像一条既定路线突然被打断。女性当然有拒绝一段感情的权利,但在婚礼即将开始、所有人都已经到场的情况下反悔,本身也会影响父母家庭以及所有参与者。这种复杂性让艾米丽的犹豫显得不合时宜,却又真实而尖锐。
然而让我更震撼的是周围人的反应。镇上的人,包括她的父亲,并没有选择与她争吵或反对,而是用极其平和温柔的方式安慰她,说一切都会好起来。她的反抗被视为一时的情绪,而不是一个真正改变未来的选择。
没有人真正考虑她不结婚的可能性,因为在这个小镇的价值体系中,人生本应该按照既定的三幕式展开:生活、婚姻、死亡,直至永恒。婚礼上的一位中年妇女一边抹眼泪,一边对着镜头说这很 lovely,虽然她不知道为什么,却就是觉得很 lovely。所有人都认为这很美好。
这一场景让我感受到,小镇的稳定与传统并不是通过强制维持的,而是通过温和的劝说和集体的无声默认。即使怀疑出现,也会重新被吸纳到循环中。婚礼在这里并不是一个可以被真正改变的人生决定,而是一项必须完成的人生步骤。这种对生命重复性的呈现,也让我联想到《等待戈多》。二者虽然形式不同,但都展现了人被困在循环中的状态。因此,这个片段让我对《我们的小镇》中传统的力量有了更深的理解。